Back to Exhibit Index

In the complaint, Ryan Dillon-Capps referenced the rule’s extraordinary circumstances exception under Local Rule 6(b)(1) and asserted that the substance of the allegations justified exceeding the page limit.

FROM

ryan@mxt3.com

TO

4CCA-JudicialComplaints@ca4.uscourts.gov

DATE

2025-04-22 16:05

Summary

Re: CONFIDENTIAL: Submission received relative to judicial complaint. Page 1: Ryan Dillon-Capps respectfully noted that the submission referernced LocalRule 6(B)(1) and provided five (5) reasons to support extraordinary cirumstances. The email requested "confirmation as to whether a determination has been made that the circumstances presented do not qualify as extraordinary".

Exhibit: 501C

Pages: 1

Inline Document Preview

If the document fails to render or triggers a download, use the buttons above.

2025 © MXT3 | Judicial Transparency | All Rights Reserved

    Exhibit 501C: Allegations of Obstruction, Falsification, and Misconduct Under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001, 1503, 1512, 1519, 1621, 2071 | Judicial Transparency