Chief Judge Diaz dismissed the complaint as merit-related and further asserted that the complaint lacked sufficient supporting evidence.
FROM
4CCA-JudicialComplaints@ca4.uscourts.gov
TO
ryan@mxt3.com
DATE
2025-05-27 11:06
Summary
CONFIDENTIAL: 04-25-90049, Chief Judge's Order Filed. Attached is 04-25-90049--ChiefJudgeOrderFiled.pdf", and "04-25-90049--CJorder.pdf". Page 7: Letter shows Nwamka Anowi signed the letter in blue ink, notation "NA/swv", and the body states "Enclosed is a copy of an order dismissing your judicial complaint. You have the right to petition the Fourth Circuit Judicial Council for review of this order. If you choose to file a petition for review, it must be filed in the clerk's office within 42 days after the date of the chief judge’s order. See Rule 18 of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings." Pags 2–6: Order shows Albert Diaz signed in black ink, and falsely claims the complaint lacked evidence. Diaz asserted that "subject judge" had directed court staff in how to docket what had been filed, and claims it is one of Hurson's rulings–except there is no court order issued. Additionally, the Case Manager, Bayee Wilson, had identified the person as "the judge", and Diaz assertion definitively establishes that the Brendan A. Hurson is "the judge" who had: 1. possession of all materials filed before they were docketed with missing pages, 2. directed her to not docket everything submitted in the original pleading, 3. directed her to not correct the altered documents with missing pages with complete copies on the signed phsyical CD. 4. directed her to input the original pleading exhibits as supplementally submitted and entered a week after they were actually recieved.
Exhibit: 501G
Pages: 7
Inline Document Preview
If the document fails to render or triggers a download, use the buttons above.