Summary

July 7, 2025—Complaint Against 4th Circuit and District of Maryland — Exhibit 401 || Email 1 of 4. Attached is "401-dcmd-affidavitaccessibility-court-records-v3.pdf","20250707-dcmd-4th-JudicialComplaintForm.pdf","20250430-complaint-v3-signed.pdf", and twenty screenshots embedded into the email as image.png files. Pages 1–3: includes portions of text from the "Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings" that clarifies what a judicial complaint is, and the responsibility of the judges to report and chief judge to follow-up on misconduct. Pages 114–124: Attachment 202507-dcmd-4th-judicialcomplaintForm.pdf" The district and circuit judges are named. Page 1 of the complaint begins: "To prevent any ambiguity, my legal position is as follows: 1. The state plaintiff obtained a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. Under Maryland law, this renders the state action vitiated and my former employer owes me for costs. This outcome alters our legal relationship in my favor and renders me the prevailing party without any concern for preclusion. 2. When Mr. Hurson invoked the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, he deprived himself of Article III jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits, and after affirmatively declaring he is not finding jurisdiction he provided a protective shield around my entire case—preserving every claim and defendant untouched. 3. When Mr. Hurson destroyed portions of the court record and obstructed docketing of other materials, he deprived the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit of the statutory requirement for appellate review on the merits. All of my claims and defendants are free of any impediment and at no risk of an adverse ruling that will alter this. Therefore, there is no way to misrepresent this complaint as being anything but a concern for the conduct of Fourth Circuit judges, District of Maryland judges, and U.S. Marshals." The end of page 1 into the top of page 2 of the complaint reads: "Procedurally, the following should now occur: 1. A copy of this complaint should be distributed to all Article III judges in the District of Maryland and the Fourth Circuit. 2. There are no remaining judges, and the matter must be transmitted—alongside the complaint against Mr. Hurson—to the Judicial Conference of the United States. 3. All judges and U.S. Marshalls need to disclose everything to the U.S. Judicial Conference and cooperate with the investigation." Before the six page exhibit table begins page 3 of the complaint asserts: "Judicial complaints are for the benefit of the Judiciary. This complaint has three layers of verification. (1) Every judge who receives it is personally accountable for ensuring it reaches its proper destination. (2) The U.S. Marshals copied on this message are equally accountable. Discretion is the power to decide how to fulfill your duty—not the power to impose your own will. If I have to choose between the Constitution and raising formal allegations against another dozen judges, the superior duty will win every time."