Ryan Dillon-Capps requested confirmation and acknowledgment of the petition for review specifically concerning the Hurson complaint.
FROM
Ryan Dillon-Capps <ryan@mxt3.com>
TO
<undisclosed-recipients>, 4cca-judicialcomplaints@ca4.uscourts.gov
DATE
2025-07-09 17:54
Summary
RE: CONFIDENTIAL: 04-25-90084(L), Judicial Complaint Received. Attached is "04-25-90049--Response to 07-09-2025 email.pdf". Page 3: Letter is signed by Anowi in blue ink, notated "NA/slp", and the body states: "This acknowledges receipt of your July 9, 2025, email in which you requested confirmation of a petition for review dated June 7, 2025. We have no record of receiving any correspondence or filings from you in June. However, we received multiple emails from you this week containing duplicate copies of your complaint against the Fourth Circuit and Maryland judges; duplicate copies of your prior complaint against Judge Hurson; and multiple exhibits. If one of those documents was intended to be a petition for review, please resubmit only that document, clearly labeled “petition for review” and setting forth “the reason why the petition should be granted.” Rule 18(b), Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings. If your resubmission adheres to these requirements and is received by July 31, 2025, it will be deemed timely pursuant to Judicial-Conduct Rule 18(e)."
Exhibit: 501Q
Pages: 2
Inline Document Preview
If the document fails to render or triggers a download, use the buttons above.