Summary

Fwd: CONFIDENTIAL: 04-25-90084(L), Judicial Complaint Received. Attached is "04-25-90049--Response to 07-09-2025 email.pdf" Page 1: ""This acknowledges receipt of your July 9, 2025, email in which you requested confirmation of a petition for review dated June 7, 2025. We have no record of receiving any correspondence or filings from you in June. However, we received multiple emails from you this week containing duplicate copies of your complaint against the Fourth Circuit and Maryland judges; duplicate copies of your prior complaint against Judge Hurson; and multiple exhibits. If one of those documents was intended to be a petition for review, please resubmit only that document, clearly labeled “petition for review” and setting forth “the reason why the petition should be granted.” Rule 18(b), Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings. If your resubmission adheres to these requirements and is received by July 31, 2025, it will be deemed timely pursuant to Judicial-Conduct Rule 18(e)." Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings R.3(c), in relative part states "A “complaint” is: a document that... or information from any source, other than a document described in (c)(1), that gives a chief judge probable cause to believe that a covered judge, as defined in Rule 1(b), has engaged in misconduct or may have a disability, whether or not the information is framed as or is intended to be an allegation of misconduct or disability." “I hereby petition the judicial council for review of my judicial complaint against Brendan A. Hurson" and I have made the leading document and its supporting evidence publicly available for download via www.mxt3.com."" Pages 1-4: Shows Exhibit 803R responding to Exhibit 803Q with the letter from Exhibit 803Q. ************************** *** SEE EXHIBIT 803K *** "We are in receipt of your email in which you indicate that you wish to file a judicial complaint against Judge Hurson and other judges."

Tags