Back to Exhibit Index

Re: Impaired Access to the Court

FROM

ryan@mxt3.com

TO

pacer@psc.uscourts.gov, kristin_baczynski@ao.uscourts.gov

DATE

2025-07-24 07:15

Summary

Ryan Dillon-Capps reasserts his rights an restates his legal right to access PACER without being charged. The email includes summary details of Mandatory Disqualification and reassignment, Risk of Witness Tampering, GPO statute requiring GovInfo to maintain complete and accurate court records, U.S. marshals visit, and challenges the legitimacy of the process being used by PACER. Ending with clearly stating "I understand that under the law, I am exempt from PACER fees—for all courts and for all fees related to electronic access. This exemption is not a discretionary courtesy, but a legal right. It does not rest on arbitrary or capricious rulings, but on a proper understanding of judicial discretion. “Discretion,” in its lawful sense, refers to the authority to determine how to fulfill a legal duty—not whether to fulfill it."

Tags

pacer
exemption
waiver
credit request

Exhibit: 801L

Pages: 9

Inline Document Preview

If the document fails to render or triggers a download, use the buttons above.

2025 © MXT3 | Judicial Transparency | All Rights Reserved

    Re: Impaired Access to the Court | Judicial Transparency